Evaluation timing, transparency, and review cadence
DomainsDOL EnglishProduct133 words1 min read
DEC-0022 - Evaluation timing, transparency, and review cadence
Phần tiêu đề “DEC-0022 - Evaluation timing, transparency, and review cadence”Context
Phần tiêu đề “Context”Need to finalize when reset is evaluated, how much condition detail users can see, and how often defaults can change.
Decision
Phần tiêu đề “Decision”Reset evaluation timing:
- Evaluate eligibility only after result is available.
- For async-scored exercises (Writing/Speaking), evaluation waits for scoring completion.
Transparency policy:
- Show a concise checklist in user-facing UI for reset conditions.
- Checklist reflects key signals (similar exercise match, practice time, completion ratio) in plain language.
Review cadence policy:
- Freeze threshold defaults for first 3 months from rollout.
- After freeze period, review thresholds monthly.
Rationale
Phần tiêu đề “Rationale”Result-ready evaluation improves consistency and avoids premature resets. A concise checklist increases trust without overload. A 3-month freeze prevents rule churn during early adoption, while monthly review supports gradual optimization at scale.